through the looking glass

Only after this was downloaded from my camera into iPhoto could I see the world in her eye.  The photographer, the line of field and sky –  the mirror of her eye holding it all.

I don’t think that we really look, most of the time.  There is a meditation called gazing that I have practiced a number of times.  Two people sit face-to-face and gaze into each others’ eyes for five or so minutes.  There is the first nervousness, the twitchy, uncomfortable feeling of being seen, of being naked in a close-up way.  Self-conscious giggles.  At some point there may be a calm, or maybe not.

I am aware of how much of my life is scanning – a minimal taking-in of what I see.  A surface tour.  Not very often sinking into the depths, or awakening the peripheral.  The visual sense is so predominant, and yet so often (for me at least) lacking in detail.

I think that is one of the reasons that I love the camera.  It takes me in and let’s me stay.  Gazing, rapt, voracious even. Framing, capturing, dancing with it – my landscape partners, my subjects.

How do you see?

SHARE & EMAIL

2 Responses »

  1. I am always amazed at how timely your posts are Paula to my own life moments. Is it that everything pertains to each of us all the time? Or do we understand/hear things only when we are ready? Is there synchronicity? Why animals? I have shared your blog with a friend who just started a life with horses and again with her husband returning from Iraq after multiple tours. I am sure that she will join in.
    Thank you
    Diane

    • Thank you Diane! I think that everything does pertain, but it lands when we are ready. I do know that for me, the animals are pure source.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>